Over 59540
politifake

Oklahoma Politics


OKLAHOMA - the pure state




The Sooner State -




OKLAHOMA (THE TORNADO STATE) -




Here's your new republiklan party... now, go get stoned everyone... -


TAGS: scott esk oklahoma gop stone
Rating: 2.14/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - June 16, 2014, 1:22 am
Fair enough. My apologies then if I misunderstood you. Thank you for restoring my faith in you, and in man a little bit. It's an emotional issue for me because I have g ay friends who have been hurt by hate speech and violence. Hope u understand. Cheers.
EmmaRoydes - June 16, 2014, 12:50 am
wow, you really jumped off the reservation with this crap. Where did I defend g a y capital punishment? You are grasping with straws with this bs. You must have been consulting with cranky or something since that's his mo.
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 11:45 pm
...Cheers. =-)
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 11:44 pm
..but continue to give quotes from The Examiner,The Onion,tabloids, conservative blogs and make-believe from the Bible to back ur claims. Who needs the vast left-wing conspiracy when you got this lovely Bigfoot loving,WMD lying,racist rightwing blogshere?
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 11:35 pm
Then, according to your logic, I guess W.Bush and Powell works for ABC, CBS, MSNBC and the NY times because both of them had disowned the lies you are pushing. Only Cheney, tongue-planted-firmly-in-cheek, still makes this claim...
OTC - June 15, 2014, 11:01 pm
Should I have given links to ABC, CBS, MSNBC, or the New York Times, oh wait, I said the liberal media didn't cover the story, I guess they wouldn't be able to bash Bush if they did.
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 9:01 pm
Wow, you quoted a tabloid. Next time, try quoting a reputable news source that doesn't vouch for Bigfoot and Bruce Campbell's Elvis. Hint: the onion doesn't count either.
OTC - June 15, 2014, 8:00 pm
*lie
OTC - June 15, 2014, 7:59 pm
http://www.examiner.com/article/syrian-chemical-weapons-may-shed-light-on-saddam-s-missing-wmds because Saddam never used chemical weapons against the Kurds, right? That was a kie too
Mooooooooooooooooooo - June 15, 2014, 7:55 pm

Drop the mom stuff and the herpes stuff. It's supposed to be a nice Sunday FFS.
OTC - June 15, 2014, 7:53 pm
http://www.nysun.com/foreign/iraqs-wmd-secreted-in-syria-sada-says/26514/
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 5:06 pm
You're full of s'hit,OTC. Even Bush himself acknowledges that's a lie, including Powell and pretty much everyone else other than that retard Cheney,and Kool-aid drinkers like u. And you didnt give me herpes,OTC.You must be confusing me w/ur mum again X-D
OTC - June 15, 2014, 4:52 pm
If you have herpes there is medication for it. An Iraqi general confessed to moving the WMDs to Syria prior to the Gulf War, of course the liberal media didn't report that
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 4:29 pm
...and this politician, Scott Esk, supports the murder of law-abiding Americans by stoning? being g** is not against the law. Being g** is certain legal by American law. You are an American-law denier, OTC.
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 4:26 pm
So...basically, OTC, you are comparing homo***uals to terrorists and terrorist sympathizers? So you are saying that being homo***ual is a crime punishable by death? You do acknowledge, neanderthal, that homo***uals are law-abiding American citizens...
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 4:22 pm
Even so, OTC, some might argue (compellingly so) that military action against terrorists and terrorist sympathizers is NOT the same thing as endorsing barbaric torture/execution of law-abiding American citizens. Are you in support of the later?
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 4:21 pm
That's a herpa derp comparison. Personally, I agree with you about the drone strikes. But, given your politics, do you then comdemn Bush's illegal pre-emptive invasion of Iraq based upon falsified evidence?
OTC - June 15, 2014, 4:13 pm
Yeah, our government isn't in favor of capital punishment http://nytimes.com/2013/11/02/world/asia/drone-strike-hits-compound-used-by-pakistani-taliban-leader.html
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 3:57 pm
P.S. by not disagreeing with his stance when given multiple chances, you are all but officially endorsing. So...do you (a) support his belief that we should stone law-abiding Americans? (b) condemn it, or (c) dodge my question [same as (a)]
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 3:31 pm
You are defending homos exual capital punishment. None of these politicians have come out in defense of capital punishment against Muslims, g ays, etc. You're grasping for straws, and defending the indefensible. Grow a conscience.
fauxnews - June 15, 2014, 3:29 pm
Please list a quote from ANYONE one of them they say directly in an interview "I support beheading/stoning x y o z" And if you "Same thing" that's dishonest. The difference is this idiot is defending the practice of stoning g**s & so are you. Nice to know
EmmaRoydes - June 15, 2014, 8:10 am
Here you go faux, the list of congressmen who favor sharia:Jerrold Nadler (D-NY),Gary Ackerman (D-NY),Robert Scott (D-VA),Pete Stark (D-CA),Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO),Mike Honda (D-CA),Hank Johnson (D-GA),Justin Amash (R-Mich),Judy Chu (D-CA)
JGalt - June 14, 2014, 11:56 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASQ-yHWKSQk
foxrecon19d - June 14, 2014, 11:29 pm
And there you have it. The media is asking why this is any different than Democrats advocating Sharia Law. The Democrats have abandoned this issue, and Democrst supporters like Faux are left holding the bag
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 10:10 pm
Faux, you are saying that someone can support the KKK but not support racism. In the same manner, you are saying Democrats can support Sharia Law, but not support stoning or beheading. This guy repeated the tenants of Sharia Law which Democrats support
fauxnews - June 13, 2014, 8:37 pm
I dare you to show me a single source where 'another' politician has publicly come out in favoring of stoning or beheading another. You're being intentionally vague about this. And it's not just dems coming out against this guy. Everyone is.
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 1:58 pm
Faux, don't allow yourself to be caught up in an arguement that the Democrat Party has already planned to leave high and dry. The Democrats know they can't win on this issue. So don't let yourself be caught holding the bag when your Dem friends split
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 1:52 pm
Faux, look up the tenants of Sharia Law. Then look up the very long list of Democrats who have publicly supported Sharia Law. This guy simply repeated tenants of Sharia Law that Democrat politicians already support.
fauxnews - June 13, 2014, 1:33 pm
No, apparently he's a freak who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a political office. Show me one source from one democrat who says "stoning is okay under Sharia Law." You are really stretching here, OTC.
fauxnews - June 13, 2014, 1:32 pm
No, apparently he's a freak who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a political office. Show me one source from one democrat who says "stoning is okay under Sharia Law." You are really stretching here, Fox.
OTC - June 13, 2014, 8:59 am
You mean liberals are ok with stoning under Sharia Law but not from Biblical Law?
Zeitguy - June 13, 2014, 2:42 am
You should run for office. I
Zeitguy - June 13, 2014, 2:33 am
Your point well taken; all the GOP are attached to this Neanderthal and agree with homo***ual capital punishment. Well done.
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 12:46 am
And remember, Barack Obama's statement that he is justified in firing Hellfire missiles at you from a drone is justified because you disagree with him is also "worthy of death"
foxrecon19d - June 12, 2014, 11:55 pm
Apparently, this gentleman is simply agreeing with the dozens and dozens of Democrat politicians who support introducing Sharia Law to the United States


Amen -


TAGS: oklahoma republicans food stamps zoo
Rating: 4.07/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

Moooooooooooooooooooswife - August 17, 2015, 2:42 pm
(ADMIN EDIT) This comment has been DELETED in violation of site rules. Keep it civil or you will be banned. This is a warning.
OTC - July 20, 2015, 12:02 am
Reread that conversation (not just the two comments) and see if you can understand it. If not, well, not problem. And all this started again from a republican/democrat debate prior to the civil war, which has absolutely nothing to do with my gender
OTC - July 19, 2015, 11:58 pm
Well Q it's like this, cranky always demands facts with anything anyone posted, yet as.sumed my gender was male without knowing that fact. I was screwing with Mr. Facts since he always gives me a hard time about facts. Now, armed with that info...
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 3:18 pm
/It only matters so that you cant use the she~he argument anymore(aka.exploiting the gender card, and now the victim card).Commit to something,sitting on the fence to provide yourself with an argument is childish.My only point.You can have the final word/
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 3:17 pm
/Still not buying it.You could've just cleared it up by stating your gender since YOU played the gender card in the 1st place and brought it up AGAIN to play the victim card.So it's ON YOU to own it.Im a liberal male.SEE?Not difficult.What's your excuse?/
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 2:46 pm
/Also, I don't see anyone saying "Food stamps good." Of course it's a problem. The GOP also likes to mock the poor.Fox News has made a living off of it~http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/05/14/jon-stewart-fox-news-poor-shaming-is-easily-pro/203647
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 2:44 pm
/Untrue. The GOP twitter lectures about food stamps. Then, to ground it's argument, the GOP twitter switches to a lame a***ogy,saying "Please do not feed the animals",exact quote~and makes it case for this fallacy.Of all the comparisons, they chose that/
OTC - July 19, 2015, 1:02 pm
There's no comparison of the poor to any animals. The comparison is providing vs. not providing dependency, but the bigger problem is 46 million people need food stamps under this president and no one sees that as a problem
OTC - July 19, 2015, 9:38 am
That's right, pick out 2 comments out of an entire conversation. But I know liberals have a hard time understanding things like inferring, sarcasm, and context.
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 1:28 am
/realized my profile looks f**king stupid now with my mug and the name Mitt Romney under it. Gonna drop this acct,make a new one~same avatar,different name{Quinn or something along those lines}If there's any confusion,SEE this comment!~pEAce~lOVe~reSPEct/
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 1:21 am
/You once tried to play a gender card,and everyone's just teasing you for it{too harshly IMHO with the transgendered crap}If I were you,I wouldn't 'call-everyone-out-on-a-debate' that already ended,if you didnt wanna draw attention to it again?~Nuff said/
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 12:57 am
/And personally~I don't give a s**t if you are a woman or not.But in comment #78054 you act surprised that anyone would care even though you were the one who played the gender card in the first place.{#59471,#59523} Then you made it an issue,again.#78054/
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 12:49 am
/Nope. You clearly claimed you were a woman. You said in Comment#59471 "you a$$ume i'm a man?" followed by Comment#59523 "Yeah, you must feel bad knowing a woman has a bigger sack than you"/
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 12:40 am
/Nope. You clearly claimed you were a woman. You said in Comment#59523 "you a$$ume i'm a man?" followed by Comment#59523 "Yeah, you must feel bad knowing a woman has a bigger sack than you"/
OTC - July 18, 2015, 11:12 pm
Neither one of those "if I said" states your race
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 9:54 pm
/if I said,"Yeah, you must feel bad knowing a black man has a bigger pair than you" OR "you have to be black to understand racism" I hope peeps would tease me about it too.The gender&race card is an appeal to authority=obvious fallacy is obvious ~ FIN/
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 9:45 pm
/So...are you a chick or what?Why would it matter?Or is your intent to eternally refuse to answer just so you can use this silly argument?!?You play the fence sitting game on everything so that no one can question you.Grow a spine~or stop milking it.~ Q/
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 9:40 pm
/Comment #78058,#78059/ You're the one who said "you a$$ume i'm a man?" followed by "Yeah, you must feel bad knowing a woman has a bigger sack than you" No other woman was mentioned....so, you said it. Plain and simple./
OTC - July 18, 2015, 9:10 pm
Comment #78054
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 7:33 pm
/as a consolation prize, the GOP is presently a "zoo" - With Trump leading the pack, there's not a single one among them with a chance to win in 2016 ~ they're too busy throwing monkey poo at each other. Does that work as a reference, ma'am? ~Q/
mittromney - July 18, 2015, 7:27 pm
/comparing the poor to park animals is so much better, right?/
OTC - July 18, 2015, 5:57 pm
I don't see any reference to "zoo" animals, except by the maker of this poster
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 18, 2015, 10:55 am

If you actually think that I let anything that happens on this site bother me, you are more deluded than I ever imagined. It takes about 3 clicks to ban each one of your new accounts. I can do that with my eyes closed.
Thegde - July 18, 2015, 4:37 am
comment on this site, but that's all on you, eh?
Thegde - July 18, 2015, 4:33 am
We also see how this site works now, at least the children on it. You change the rules, then you try to make it look you didn't. Really cute, but juvenile. Thank you for reinforcing everyone’s opinions about you. That probably went over your head like any
Thegde - July 18, 2015, 4:32 am
Ooooooo, looks like your panties got bunched up really hard this time. Just go outside and get some of that fresh clean air you canadians are always bragging about. It will probably dry the tears of frustration off your face.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 17, 2015, 9:18 pm

Don't push it. You're on thin ice as it is.
Himay33 - July 17, 2015, 4:20 pm
(ADMIN EDIT) This comment has been DELETED in violation of site rules. Keep it civil or you will be banned. This is a warning.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 17, 2015, 1:44 pm
You are welcome.
rebeccaolsen - July 17, 2015, 1:49 am
Thank you for always being the gentleman when others can not. Maybe there's hope for this dump after all. You will always be my Groot. ;) Sent you my personal info in a pm. Take care of the place, will ya? Farewell Zeitguy. HUMBLED FTW *teary eyed*
rebeccaolsen - July 17, 2015, 1:45 am
OMG!You made me tear up,Zeit! :( Me and my sisters are pretty tough as nails - we more or less raised each other when we weren't picking on one another.Not raised,as much as forged by fire. So trust me when I say it takes a lot to melt this hardened heart
Zeitguy - July 17, 2015, 1:22 am
I know Becca, you're the reason that makes this site worth visiting. We may disagree from time to time but your opinion makes me think and not react in a predetermined partisan position. Too bad our government can't take lessons from the same doctrine.
rebeccaolsen - July 16, 2015, 11:46 pm
BTW Groot, you don't have to worry about speaking your mind on politifake with me :) I only take issue with trolls with hidden agendas, using these issues as baseball bats across the knees of the vulnerable. You're the real McCoy. So no worries, doll.
rebeccaolsen - July 16, 2015, 11:45 pm
It's just another mean-spirited GOP attack on the poor. You're polishing a turd here, Groot. http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/05/14/jon-stewart-fox-news-poor-shaming-is-easily-pro/203647
rebeccaolsen - July 16, 2015, 11:43 pm
As if the Republicans are objecting to this on the grounds of economic responsibility. A GOP organization, not some random voters, are comparing the poor to Zoo animals. F*ck them. They - the party of Jesus: who stood WITH the poor, not ON them.
Zeitguy - July 16, 2015, 11:10 pm
Becca, I love you but you're so missing the point. Political correctness does not alleviate economic responsiblity.
mittromney - July 16, 2015, 8:34 pm
/this is pretty f***ing funny/


PREV PAGE